Monique Barry vs Natsuho Arakawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L W L
Form
L W L L W L L L W LHead-To-Head: Barry 2 - 1 Arakawa
They have played 7 sets in total, with Barry winning 5 and Arakawa winning 2. The last match between Barry and Arakawa was at the W75 Playford, 21-10-2024, Q3, Hard with Monique Barry getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Monique Barry | 2 |
| Natsuho Arakawa | 1 |
W75 Playford(21-10-2024)
6
2
6
1
| Barry | Stats | Arakawa |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (9-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 30% (3-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 486 | Ranking | 857 |
| 471 | Highest Rank | 667 |
| 22 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (97-91) | Career Total W/L | 44% (106-134) |
| $2,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Monique Barry
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Monique Barry
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 39 | Games Won | 25 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:37:20 | Average Match Time | 1:37:20 |
| 58% (114/195) | 1st Serve % | 63% (129/206) |
| 73% (83/114) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (83/129) |
| 60% (49/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (34/77) |
| 42% (11/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 43% (89/206) | Return Points Win % | 32% (63/195) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Monique Barry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sarah Mildren
Player
Monique Barry
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Mana Kawamura
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
49%
(
40 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Monique Barry
75%
(
92 of
123)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
108)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
53 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Sarah Mildren
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Angela Cui
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
77 of
142)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
22
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
68 of
142)
123
Total Points Won
107
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiaodi You
Player
Monique Barry
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Bianca Compuesto
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Natsuho Arakawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miyu Nakashima
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Funa Kozaki
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
11
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Junri Namigata
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
8
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
7
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (97/91) | Win/Loss | 44% (106/134) |
| 51% (218/210) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (232/296) |
| 52% (1984/1856) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (2374/2532) |
| 51% (68/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (100/121) |
| 50% (16/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 59% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 324 | Aces Total | 358 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 416 | Total Double Faults | 698 |
| 1:17:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 394.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.8 |
| 61% (6016/9784) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5184/8540) |
| 61% (3687/6016) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (3156/5184) |
| 47% (1760/3768) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1427/3356) |
| 48% (604/1264) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (320/793) |
| 46% (4682/10202) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3249/8244) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (75/72) | Challenger W/L | 34% (38/75) |
| 56% (20/16) | Futures W/L | 54% (68/59) |
| 51% (96/187) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (102/235) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (12/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 29% (12/42) |
| 53% (28/53) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (28/53) |
| 85% (96/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (104/88) |
| 15% (96/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (104/16) |
| 16% (92/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (136/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
